A few aspects of your application need to be considered when selecting an electronic examiner. Each reviewer receives a structured electronic template. The template gives a step-by -step guideline for organizing the review. It also provides information about conflict of interest and the role of the electronic examiner. A well-structured and structured electronic review is key to quality applications.
Structured electronic templates
To help reviewers structure their reviews, the Structured electronic reviewer template has been created. It helps reviewers keep their focus on key points and findings. It also lists revisions necessary for publication and any optional changes. It also identifies any referee queries that are relevant to the article. The template is used by reviewers to give critical feedback on submitted manuscripts.
In August 2010, the journal published the Structured electronic Reviewer template. Since the introduction of this new process, more than 80 reviews have been performed. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of the structured electronic reviewer template on manuscript reviews.
Conflicts of interest for electronic reviewers
Electronic reviewers should be aware of any potential conflict of interest and declare it to the journal. A conflict of interests is any situation in which a reviewer may have an interest that would affect his or her ability conduct fair and objective evaluations of the work. Relevant commercial relations include research funding, grants and materials as well as in-kind service.
A reviewer's personal or business relationships can create conflicts of interest. These conflicts can be caused by personal relationships, intellectual passion, or academic competition.